prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis
  Preuzmi
PDF 241.94 KB
Znanstveni rad - Pregledni rad
Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis
International Surgery, 101 (2016), 3-4; 144-152. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1
Bakota, Bore; Kopljar, Mario; Simic, Diana; Franic, Miljenko; Staresinic, Mario; Patrlj, Leonardo

Citirajte ovaj rad

Bakota, B., Kopljar, M., Simic, D., Franic, M., Staresinic, M. i Patrlj, L. (2016). Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis. International Surgery, 101. (3-4), 144-152. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1

Bakota, Bore, et al. "Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis." International Surgery, vol. 101, br. 3-4, 2016, str. 144-152. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1

Bakota, Bore, Mario Kopljar, Diana Simic, Miljenko Franic, Mario Staresinic i Leonardo Patrlj. "Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis." International Surgery 101, br. 3-4 (2016): 144-152. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1

Bakota, B., et al. (2016) 'Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis', International Surgery, 101(3-4), str. 144-152. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1

Bakota B, Kopljar M, Simic D, Franic M, Staresinic M, Patrlj L. Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis. International Surgery [Internet]. 01.03.2016. [pristupljeno 22.11.2024.];101(3-4):144-152. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1

B. Bakota, M. Kopljar, D. Simic, M. Franic, M. Staresinic i L. Patrlj, "Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis", International Surgery, vol. 101, br. 3-4, str. 144-152, Ožujak 2016. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:264:128017. [Citirano: 22.11.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:264:128017
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Complications, pain control, and patient recovery after local versus general anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair in adults : systematic review and meta-analysis
AutorBore Bakota
AutorMario Kopljar
AutorDiana Simic
AutorMiljenko Franic
AutorMario Staresinic
AutorLeonardo Patrlj
Autorova ustanova(Klinička bolnica Merkur)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Sažetak (engleski)
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an “up-to-date” evidence-based guideline and clarify the possible benefits as well as drawbacks of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) in open inguinal hernia surgery in adults. Study method comprised randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome measures were complications, pain control, and patient recovery. Secondary outcome measures were patient satisfaction and hernia recurrence. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials contributed to the study. A total of 1677 patients were analyzed, with 953 in the LA group and 724 in the GA group. Complications were statistically less frequent in the LA group compared with the GA group [odds ratio (OR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.15, 0.64). Supplemental intraoperative analgesia had a statistical significance in the LA group, with an OR of 28.93 (95% CI, 7.86, 106.47). Postoperative pain was statistically significantly lower in the LA group [standardized eman difference (SMD), −1.06; 95% CI, −1.64, −0.48)]. Length of stay was shorter for patients who underwent operation under LA compared with those receiving GA (OR, −1.21; 95% CI, −2.08, −0.33]). Time to full mobility was shorter in the LA group, without statistical significance (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 0.19, 47.90), whereas measuring in SMD showed significance in comparison with GA (SMD, −1.74; 95% CI, −2.34, −1.14). Hernia recurrence was not noted. Patient satisfaction was greater in the LA group (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.15, 1.15). Compared with GA, LA showed superiority in terms of complications, postoperative pain, length of stay, time to full mobility, and patient satisfaction. Therefore, it appears to be a more appropriate anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair in adults.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Pregledni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaInternational Surgery
Brojčani podacivol. 101, br. 3-4, str. 144-152
p-ISSN0020-8868
e-ISSN2520-2456
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:264:128017
Datum objave publikacije2016-03-01
URL dokumentahttps://meridian.allenpress.com/international-surgery/article/101/3-4/144/115079/Complications-Pain-Control-and-Patient-Recovery
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-12-27 10:32:35